<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emma Watson in 3D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/</link>
	<description>the movie poster weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:45:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Waggon</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-9269</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Waggon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-9269</guid>
		<description>A 3d pair? or part of one?  Really?   You cannot be serious.  
How do I know?

In the writer&#039;s own words: &quot;...sadly nobody actually owns the glasses required to see it. &quot;

What a great advertising ploy, putting all that effort into making an image that nobody will be able to see and therefore not be motivated into doing any thing with the images except discuss them on forums like this.  Still, I suppose no publicity is bad..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 3d pair? or part of one?  Really?   You cannot be serious.<br />
How do I know?</p>
<p>In the writer&#8217;s own words: &#8220;&#8230;sadly nobody actually owns the glasses required to see it. &#8221;</p>
<p>What a great advertising ploy, putting all that effort into making an image that nobody will be able to see and therefore not be motivated into doing any thing with the images except discuss them on forums like this.  Still, I suppose no publicity is bad..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FIRE</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-9097</link>
		<dc:creator>FIRE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-9097</guid>
		<description>Tiny tits looks better anyway, because tiny tits looks real.
Nothing is more discusting than silicon tits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiny tits looks better anyway, because tiny tits looks real.<br />
Nothing is more discusting than silicon tits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FIRE</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-9096</link>
		<dc:creator>FIRE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-9096</guid>
		<description>This is crap. If you have a girl, you should ofcourse be allowed to shape her any way you see fit to make her more atractive in your own eyes.

She is your properta and you call the shots. If you don`t like her name for instance, change it. 

If she is to fat, have her run while you drive slowly behind until she reaches the desired proportions.

There are a lot of things you can do to a girl to make her more atractive.
Be creative! 

And forget about &quot;feminism&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is crap. If you have a girl, you should ofcourse be allowed to shape her any way you see fit to make her more atractive in your own eyes.</p>
<p>She is your properta and you call the shots. If you don`t like her name for instance, change it. </p>
<p>If she is to fat, have her run while you drive slowly behind until she reaches the desired proportions.</p>
<p>There are a lot of things you can do to a girl to make her more atractive.<br />
Be creative! </p>
<p>And forget about &#8220;feminism&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screen Machine &#187; Oh lovely boy:</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8805</link>
		<dc:creator>Screen Machine &#187; Oh lovely boy:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8805</guid>
		<description>[...] be it body fascism or age fascism. New Moon is certainly guilty of this: as Emma Watson was enhanced by photoshop in the promos for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Lautner was forced to undergo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be it body fascism or age fascism. New Moon is certainly guilty of this: as Emma Watson was enhanced by photoshop in the promos for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Lautner was forced to undergo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allaiyah</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8778</link>
		<dc:creator>Allaiyah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8778</guid>
		<description>Her hair was photoshopped too. Why, I can;t imagine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her hair was photoshopped too. Why, I can;t imagine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xoni</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8774</link>
		<dc:creator>xoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8774</guid>
		<description>Everybody knows big boobs sell and little boobs suck so that is the reason her boobs got suddenly bigger (though not big enough to make me want to watch that POS move anyway).

It&#039;s too bad really... I used to like tiny boobs but then I grew up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody knows big boobs sell and little boobs suck so that is the reason her boobs got suddenly bigger (though not big enough to make me want to watch that POS move anyway).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too bad really&#8230; I used to like tiny boobs but then I grew up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike H</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8773</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8773</guid>
		<description>You people are stupid. These are two different pictures. When they take photos for a poster like this, they dont just take one photo, they take many. These are two different photos taken probably a second apart. In the one on the left, Emma is just sucking in stomach in a little more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people are stupid. These are two different pictures. When they take photos for a poster like this, they dont just take one photo, they take many. These are two different photos taken probably a second apart. In the one on the left, Emma is just sucking in stomach in a little more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ????????? &#124; SweetRiver</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8771</link>
		<dc:creator>????????? &#124; SweetRiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8771</guid>
		<description>[...] ???Emma???????????????????????? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ???Emma???????????????????????? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Airbrushed Celebs - After Seppuku</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8731</link>
		<dc:creator>Airbrushed Celebs - After Seppuku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 05:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8731</guid>
		<description>[...] a second, 3-D version of the flick to IMAX theaters which included a 20-minute extended finale. But that&#039;s not all Warner Bros. added. On the left, the above image shows the actors as they appeared on the movie poster for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a second, 3-D version of the flick to IMAX theaters which included a 20-minute extended finale. But that&#8217;s not all Warner Bros. added. On the left, the above image shows the actors as they appeared on the movie poster for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiger</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8720</link>
		<dc:creator>tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://posterwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/emma-watson-in-3d/#comment-8720</guid>
		<description>that is so lame.. get a life dude..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is so lame.. get a life dude..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 400/435 objects using disk: basic

Served from: posterwire.com @ 2012-02-02 14:40:12 -->
