<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Head Strip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/07/03/super-head-strip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/07/03/super-head-strip/</link>
	<description>the movie poster weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:45:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane Cook: Movie Poster Critic &#124; Posterwire.com</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/07/03/super-head-strip/#comment-9222</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane Cook: Movie Poster Critic &#124; Posterwire.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/07/03/super-head-strip/#comment-9222</guid>
		<description>[...] perils of the &#8220;constructed reality&#8221; in movie posters based around unit photography and head strips. But you have to wonder if Dane Cook hates the My Best Friend&#8217;s Girl movie poster key art so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] perils of the &#8220;constructed reality&#8221; in movie posters based around unit photography and head strips. But you have to wonder if Dane Cook hates the My Best Friend&#8217;s Girl movie poster key art so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keira&#8217;s Breasts &#171; Posterwire.com &#171; the movie poster weblog</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/07/03/super-head-strip/#comment-8306</link>
		<dc:creator>Keira&#8217;s Breasts &#171; Posterwire.com &#171; the movie poster weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/07/03/super-head-strip/#comment-8306</guid>
		<description>[...] are marketed (News Flash: Americans like large breasts), but she goes on to admit she does have final approval over how she is portrayed in key art. In the same interview she says about appearing on magazine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are marketed (News Flash: Americans like large breasts), but she goes on to admit she does have final approval over how she is portrayed in key art. In the same interview she says about appearing on magazine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl sinfield</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/07/03/super-head-strip/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>karl sinfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 10:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/07/03/super-head-strip/#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Two very dodgy necks there - I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if this leads to a new contractual clause: &quot;Neck approval&quot; - where stars can check how weird their necks look when their lovely headshots are grafted onto new bodies of varying suitability. &lt;b&gt;I&#039;m not criticising&lt;/b&gt; - I could do no better. I just can&#039;t help but feel the pain of the designers involved when I see something like this. 

But at the end of the day, aren&#039;t we all being a bit precious - it does the job, doesn&#039;t it? I mean, not every film is after the same audience for &lt;i&gt;Pi&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;Adaptation&lt;/i&gt; is it? So while all this is interesting to note - I don&#039;t think it really matters...but then does anything really matter? ...Oh no, I&#039;ve gone all emo...Uma Thurman&#039;s neck has made me doubt the usefulness of my existence!...somebody, please make it stop!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Two very dodgy necks there &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if this leads to a new contractual clause: &#8220;Neck approval&#8221; &#8211; where stars can check how weird their necks look when their lovely headshots are grafted onto new bodies of varying suitability. <b>I&#8217;m not criticising</b> &#8211; I could do no better. I just can&#8217;t help but feel the pain of the designers involved when I see something like this. </p>
<p>But at the end of the day, aren&#8217;t we all being a bit precious &#8211; it does the job, doesn&#8217;t it? I mean, not every film is after the same audience for <i>Pi</i> or <i>Adaptation</i> is it? So while all this is interesting to note &#8211; I don&#8217;t think it really matters&#8230;but then does anything really matter? &#8230;Oh no, I&#8217;ve gone all emo&#8230;Uma Thurman&#8217;s neck has made me doubt the usefulness of my existence!&#8230;somebody, please make it stop!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/07/03/super-head-strip/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/07/03/super-head-strip/#comment-583</guid>
		<description>This is also getting a mention over at the Adfreak blog:

http://adweek.blogs.com/adfreak/2006/06/uma_thurmans_se.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is also getting a mention over at the Adfreak blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://adweek.blogs.com/adfreak/2006/06/uma_thurmans_se.html" rel="nofollow">http://adweek.blogs.com/adfreak/2006/06/uma_thurmans_se.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 325/329 objects using disk: basic

Served from: posterwire.com @ 2012-02-07 03:14:16 -->
