Comments on: Saw 3 Poster http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/28/saw-3-poster/ the movie poster weblog Wed, 09 May 2012 11:42:01 +0000 hourly 1 By: jesenia http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/28/saw-3-poster/#comment-593 jesenia Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:58:57 +0000 http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/28/saw-3-poster/#comment-593 dis is scary dis is scary

]]>
By: kim http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/28/saw-3-poster/#comment-589 kim Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:03:27 +0000 http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/28/saw-3-poster/#comment-589 I LOOOOOVE JIGSAW! I LOOOOOVE JIGSAW!

]]>
By: karl sinfield http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/28/saw-3-poster/#comment-582 karl sinfield Sat, 01 Jul 2006 11:12:05 +0000 http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/28/saw-3-poster/#comment-582 Didn't this happen with the original Saw poster as well? I'm sure the initial teasers were stark shots of dismembered limbs, and then by the time the release came around, they were in negative...maybe just in the UK... Didn’t this happen with the original Saw poster as well? I’m sure the initial teasers were stark shots of dismembered limbs, and then by the time the release came around, they were in negative…maybe just in the UK…

]]>
By: caldera http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/28/saw-3-poster/#comment-580 caldera Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:40:14 +0000 http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/28/saw-3-poster/#comment-580 i study graphic design in são paulo, brazil... and i just love the site, it's very usefull... please continue the good work =D and worst then teeth are the eyes... =~~ i study graphic design in são paulo, brazil… and i just love the site, it’s very usefull… please continue the good work =D
and worst then teeth are the eyes… =~~

]]>
By: Marc http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/28/saw-3-poster/#comment-579 Marc Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:04:59 +0000 http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/28/saw-3-poster/#comment-579 Wow...how long before the Goatse guy ends up on one of them? Wow…how long before the Goatse guy ends up on one of them?

]]>