<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remaking Star Wars DVD Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/</link>
	<description>the movie poster weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Star Wars DVD Art &#124; The Sheila Variations</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/comment-page-1/#comment-8974</link>
		<dc:creator>Star Wars DVD Art &#124; The Sheila Variations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/#comment-8974</guid>
		<description>[...] Great post on a great site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Great post on a great site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/comment-page-1/#comment-8790</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/#comment-8790</guid>
		<description>Why did George Lucas allow these crappy covers to go on teh re-releases? Don&#039;t the marketing department realize no-one wants an &quot;updated&quot; or &quot;Improved&quot; cover. We want the artwork that we grew up loving and that, in this case, means the proper had drawn covers. Stop dishing out crap that no one wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did George Lucas allow these crappy covers to go on teh re-releases? Don&#8217;t the marketing department realize no-one wants an &#8220;updated&#8221; or &#8220;Improved&#8221; cover. We want the artwork that we grew up loving and that, in this case, means the proper had drawn covers. Stop dishing out crap that no one wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/comment-page-1/#comment-8384</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/#comment-8384</guid>
		<description>Aaargh! I positively HATE these cheap montages...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaargh! I positively HATE these cheap montages&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sancho</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/comment-page-1/#comment-7958</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sancho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/#comment-7958</guid>
		<description>George Lucas needs to call   Lowry Digital again! and restore the original trilogy &quot;unaltered&quot;  once and for all!like 2004 special edition dvd .and transfer the restore the original negatives into the  Blue Ray Format coman George im sure you wont lose money thats what all fans really want!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Lucas needs to call   Lowry Digital again! and restore the original trilogy &#8220;unaltered&#8221;  once and for all!like 2004 special edition dvd .and transfer the restore the original negatives into the  Blue Ray Format coman George im sure you wont lose money thats what all fans really want!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GEcKo</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/comment-page-1/#comment-5571</link>
		<dc:creator>GEcKo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/#comment-5571</guid>
		<description>In new DVD Cover Mark shows like a graphic computer...
Very strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In new DVD Cover Mark shows like a graphic computer&#8230;<br />
Very strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Down10</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Down10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the reason that movie posters aren&#039;t typically used as DVD covers is that they aren&#039;t neccessarily suitible for shelf display -- from a &quot;point-of-purchase&quot; standpoint?

These new Star Wars DVD works were obviously made in Photoshop, and its purpose was possibly to have the ability to reposition the characters in order to make promotional materials. ...Doesn&#039;t stop it from looking tacky, though.

I&#039;ve noticed a trend in movie poster design to be VERY simple lately, often comprised of one or two subjects in a symmetrical layout... and this I suspect is due to adapting the imagery not just for posters, but for DVD covers, web sites, billboards, banners, promotional materials, etc. It&#039;s like the posters are no longer posters, in the traditional sense, but displays of the movie&#039;s &quot;icons&quot;, as it were.

...my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the reason that movie posters aren&#8217;t typically used as DVD covers is that they aren&#8217;t neccessarily suitible for shelf display &#8212; from a &#8220;point-of-purchase&#8221; standpoint?</p>
<p>These new Star Wars DVD works were obviously made in Photoshop, and its purpose was possibly to have the ability to reposition the characters in order to make promotional materials. &#8230;Doesn&#8217;t stop it from looking tacky, though.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed a trend in movie poster design to be VERY simple lately, often comprised of one or two subjects in a symmetrical layout&#8230; and this I suspect is due to adapting the imagery not just for posters, but for DVD covers, web sites, billboards, banners, promotional materials, etc. It&#8217;s like the posters are no longer posters, in the traditional sense, but displays of the movie&#8217;s &#8220;icons&#8221;, as it were.</p>
<p>&#8230;my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dritchie</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/comment-page-1/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>dritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 06:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/#comment-568</guid>
		<description>The Vader pose on the ESB is actually from the marketing art from Revenge of the Sith. The photo art on the SW DVDs (including the previous releases and the prequels) annoys me intensely, especially considering the rich history of posters that the films have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Vader pose on the ESB is actually from the marketing art from Revenge of the Sith. The photo art on the SW DVDs (including the previous releases and the prequels) annoys me intensely, especially considering the rich history of posters that the films have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mulch</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>mulch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/#comment-567</guid>
		<description>The new Empire poster is particularly repulsive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Empire poster is particularly repulsive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benn</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Benn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 02:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/#comment-566</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s time for a quote from George Lucas!

Drew Struzan: â€œWhy do you use illustration to advertise and represent your projects? Computer manipulated photographs dominate the advertising of so many studios, but you continue to loyally choose illustrationâ€¦.â€

George Lucas: â€œThe kind of movies I make are more fanciful in nature, more mythical in nature. To market my films, I like to move one step away from photo- realism to something thatâ€™s a little grander, a little more glorious, and something a bit more romantic than what you get with just simple photographs.â€ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s time for a quote from George Lucas!</p>
<p>Drew Struzan: â€œWhy do you use illustration to advertise and represent your projects? Computer manipulated photographs dominate the advertising of so many studios, but you continue to loyally choose illustrationâ€¦.â€</p>
<p>George Lucas: â€œThe kind of movies I make are more fanciful in nature, more mythical in nature. To market my films, I like to move one step away from photo- realism to something thatâ€™s a little grander, a little more glorious, and something a bit more romantic than what you get with just simple photographs.â€</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jg</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Jg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 02:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2006/06/06/remaking-star-wars-dvd-art/#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Funny, isn&#039;t it, how the Luke Skywalker in the original Episode IV poster looks more &quot;real&quot; than the Mark Hamill in the updated DVD cover. Ditto the painted Han Solo in the original Empire Strikes Back poster.

But what&#039;s up with Solo in the Return of the Jedi poster? He looks like he&#039;s trying not to throw up on Leia&#039;s head...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, isn&#8217;t it, how the Luke Skywalker in the original Episode IV poster looks more &#8220;real&#8221; than the Mark Hamill in the updated DVD cover. Ditto the painted Han Solo in the original Empire Strikes Back poster.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s up with Solo in the Return of the Jedi poster? He looks like he&#8217;s trying not to throw up on Leia&#8217;s head&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
