<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Poster of the Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/</link>
	<description>the movie poster weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:45:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Saw 3 Poster « Posterwire.com » the movie poster weblog</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-8824</link>
		<dc:creator>Saw 3 Poster « Posterwire.com » the movie poster weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-8824</guid>
		<description>[...] no secret that Posterwire.com is a big fan of the previous Saw one-sheets. Continuing with a variation of the &#8220;body parts&#8221; poster [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no secret that Posterwire.com is a big fan of the previous Saw one-sheets. Continuing with a variation of the &#8220;body parts&#8221; poster [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Movie Poster of the Year &#171; Posterwire.com &#171; the movie poster weblog</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-8349</link>
		<dc:creator>Movie Poster of the Year &#171; Posterwire.com &#171; the movie poster weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-8349</guid>
		<description>[...] We give out another award to Lionsgate marketing and Art Machine film ad agency just like we did last year. This year-end poster recognition is also known as the 2nd Annual Posterwire.com Movie Poster of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We give out another award to Lionsgate marketing and Art Machine film ad agency just like we did last year. This year-end poster recognition is also known as the 2nd Annual Posterwire.com Movie Poster of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Movie Poster of the Year &#171; Posterwire.com &#171; the movie poster weblog</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-6439</link>
		<dc:creator>Movie Poster of the Year &#171; Posterwire.com &#171; the movie poster weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-6439</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#039;s the end of the year and that can only mean one thing: We give out another award to Lionsgate marketing and Art Machine film ad agency just like we did last year. This year-end poster recognition is also known as the 2nd Annual Posterwire.com Movie Poster of the Year Award. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s the end of the year and that can only mean one thing: We give out another award to Lionsgate marketing and Art Machine film ad agency just like we did last year. This year-end poster recognition is also known as the 2nd Annual Posterwire.com Movie Poster of the Year Award. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 01:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-375</guid>
		<description>HAPPY NEW YEAR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAPPY NEW YEAR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott McMillin</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott McMillin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 23:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>I like the Match Point one sheet as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Match Point one sheet as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jojoken</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>jojoken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-372</guid>
		<description>this site is exactly what i need...
all about movie poster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this site is exactly what i need&#8230;<br />
all about movie poster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deafscribbler</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>deafscribbler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Well I did like the Sin City posters a lot, even if they did use the &quot;Comics sans&quot; font- which looks ridiculous in large point size and just contributed to the detrimental &quot;comic-book&quot; stereotype. It was just one step above using &quot;Biff!&quot; and &quot;Pows!&quot; to me, really. (By the by, did anyone notice how similar the poster for Bruce Willis&#039;s HOSTAGE and his SIN CITY poster were? Furthermore, the opening title sequence of HOSTAGE had much in common with Sin City too heh, imho).

Another poster I really liked was the teaser poster (or maybe it was only ad art since I first saw it in Entertainment Weekly) of ICE HARVEST. I liked how they cut both lead actors in half, with Thornton half visible on the left side, pulling the trunk, and Cusack on the right side, cut in half as well. I thought it was a very arresting visual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I did like the Sin City posters a lot, even if they did use the &#8220;Comics sans&#8221; font- which looks ridiculous in large point size and just contributed to the detrimental &#8220;comic-book&#8221; stereotype. It was just one step above using &#8220;Biff!&#8221; and &#8220;Pows!&#8221; to me, really. (By the by, did anyone notice how similar the poster for Bruce Willis&#8217;s HOSTAGE and his SIN CITY poster were? Furthermore, the opening title sequence of HOSTAGE had much in common with Sin City too heh, imho).</p>
<p>Another poster I really liked was the teaser poster (or maybe it was only ad art since I first saw it in Entertainment Weekly) of ICE HARVEST. I liked how they cut both lead actors in half, with Thornton half visible on the left side, pulling the trunk, and Cusack on the right side, cut in half as well. I thought it was a very arresting visual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>There has been a trend of very expensive promotion for &quot;DVD Premiere&quot; titles like the LILO &amp; STITCH sequel and the MULAN one. The DVD business is the largest growth sector of the business accounting for $28Billion. Theatricals account for $9B. Tv accounts for $16B. 

No doubt that Netflix has changed the business model a bit. Video-On-Demand is going to change it even more. 

You&#039;re absolutely right that VSDA has changed too. This was waaaaaay back in 2001 and we&#039;re talking KEY retailers - BB, Hollywood, Borders, Hastings, BB franchisees, etc - not Mom &amp; Pops. It&#039;s no fluke that BB won&#039;t pick up an indie title until it&#039;s been seen, rated by the MPAA (unless it&#039;s obviously family fare), and they have a chance to approve the artwork. Yes, they judge the art. It&#039;s that important. 

In fact, we once did a special for Hollywood Video where we did a key art just for their stores. They didn&#039;t like the art we originally came up with for the film and wanted something different so they could position the film in a different category slot.  

And yes, we do agree key art is that -- key.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a trend of very expensive promotion for &#8220;DVD Premiere&#8221; titles like the LILO &amp; STITCH sequel and the MULAN one. The DVD business is the largest growth sector of the business accounting for $28Billion. Theatricals account for $9B. Tv accounts for $16B. </p>
<p>No doubt that Netflix has changed the business model a bit. Video-On-Demand is going to change it even more. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right that VSDA has changed too. This was waaaaaay back in 2001 and we&#8217;re talking KEY retailers &#8211; BB, Hollywood, Borders, Hastings, BB franchisees, etc &#8211; not Mom &amp; Pops. It&#8217;s no fluke that BB won&#8217;t pick up an indie title until it&#8217;s been seen, rated by the MPAA (unless it&#8217;s obviously family fare), and they have a chance to approve the artwork. Yes, they judge the art. It&#8217;s that important. </p>
<p>In fact, we once did a special for Hollywood Video where we did a key art just for their stores. They didn&#8217;t like the art we originally came up with for the film and wanted something different so they could position the film in a different category slot.  </p>
<p>And yes, we do agree key art is that &#8212; key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Nunez</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Nunez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-364</guid>
		<description>I would have to put the &lt;i&gt;Walk the Line&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.filmlisten.no/cgi-bin/visbilde.cgi?id=14800&amp;typeid=1422&amp;type=nyhet&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;teaser poster&lt;/a&gt; right near the top. The artwork is simple and immensely cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to put the <i>Walk the Line</i> <a href="http://www.filmlisten.no/cgi-bin/visbilde.cgi?id=14800&amp;typeid=1422&amp;type=nyhet" rel="nofollow">teaser poster</a> right near the top. The artwork is simple and immensely cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/12/28/movie-poster-of-the-year/#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Bill, it&#039;s always interesting to hear from someone who has worked in some part of the biz.

How many years ago was your VSDA experiences? Because, sadly, there are fewer small retailers these days -- the death of the &quot;Mom and Pop&quot; video store. (And if Netflix has it&#039;s way, one of the biggies will die off too.) 

All of the big retailers have so much more control over the studio&#039;s campaigns and DVD releases. (I believe Wal-Mart won&#039;t stock an &quot;Unrated&quot; title if there isn&#039;t also a &quot;Rated&quot; version to sell.)

Anyway, I&#039;m not belittling DVD key art and home video advertising -- of course the box art can make a crucial difference when placed on store shelves -- but you have seen the shift in the way DVDs are marketed in the past year or two, no?

Someone visits Netflix and remembers they want to rent THE GRUDGE, not because of the &quot;box art&quot;, but because they saw a commercial for it on TV last night with Sarah Michelle Gellar. Even smaller films like Saw will rely on generating word-of-mouth via horror fans, which takes a lot more work than just good key art. (None of us saw the Blair Witch Project because of the poster art, did we?)

Studios make most of their money via DVDs -- so that&#039;s where all the advertising dollars seem to be moving to. It seems like every other film commercial on TV ends with &quot;Coming to DVD this Tuesday.&quot; rather than &quot;Opens in theaters this Friday.&quot;

Then you have the other recent trend of straight-to-DVD releases, such as American Pie: Band Camp, which is a whole other topic.

The point of all this is, we agree that key art (via DVD or otherwise) is important, otherwise we&#039;d have no web site. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, it&#8217;s always interesting to hear from someone who has worked in some part of the biz.</p>
<p>How many years ago was your VSDA experiences? Because, sadly, there are fewer small retailers these days &#8212; the death of the &#8220;Mom and Pop&#8221; video store. (And if Netflix has it&#8217;s way, one of the biggies will die off too.) </p>
<p>All of the big retailers have so much more control over the studio&#8217;s campaigns and DVD releases. (I believe Wal-Mart won&#8217;t stock an &#8220;Unrated&#8221; title if there isn&#8217;t also a &#8220;Rated&#8221; version to sell.)</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m not belittling DVD key art and home video advertising &#8212; of course the box art can make a crucial difference when placed on store shelves &#8212; but you have seen the shift in the way DVDs are marketed in the past year or two, no?</p>
<p>Someone visits Netflix and remembers they want to rent THE GRUDGE, not because of the &#8220;box art&#8221;, but because they saw a commercial for it on TV last night with Sarah Michelle Gellar. Even smaller films like Saw will rely on generating word-of-mouth via horror fans, which takes a lot more work than just good key art. (None of us saw the Blair Witch Project because of the poster art, did we?)</p>
<p>Studios make most of their money via DVDs &#8212; so that&#8217;s where all the advertising dollars seem to be moving to. It seems like every other film commercial on TV ends with &#8220;Coming to DVD this Tuesday.&#8221; rather than &#8220;Opens in theaters this Friday.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then you have the other recent trend of straight-to-DVD releases, such as American Pie: Band Camp, which is a whole other topic.</p>
<p>The point of all this is, we agree that key art (via DVD or otherwise) is important, otherwise we&#8217;d have no web site. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 409/413 objects using disk: basic

Served from: posterwire.com @ 2012-02-07 03:36:50 -->
