<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Little Big Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/04/16/little-big-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/04/16/little-big-men/</link>
	<description>the movie poster weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:08:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reading Between the Lines &#171; Posterwire.com &#171; the movie poster weblog</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/04/16/little-big-men/comment-page-1/#comment-8298</link>
		<dc:creator>Reading Between the Lines &#171; Posterwire.com &#171; the movie poster weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 02:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/04/16/little-big-men/#comment-8298</guid>
		<description>[...] At the other end of the sexual identity spectrum (or perhaps in the very same spectrum) is the omnipresent How can we work in a visual joke about balls? creative direction that has been issued by many film account executives. One-sheet posters for the two recent films Balls of Fury and Mr. Woodcock are here to add to that growing list. Of course, invoking imagery of said male gentilia as a visual pun in film advertising is nothing new. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At the other end of the sexual identity spectrum (or perhaps in the very same spectrum) is the omnipresent How can we work in a visual joke about balls? creative direction that has been issued by many film account executives. One-sheet posters for the two recent films Balls of Fury and Mr. Woodcock are here to add to that growing list. Of course, invoking imagery of said male gentilia as a visual pun in film advertising is nothing new. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Self Love &#171; Posterwire.com &#171; the movie poster weblog</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/04/16/little-big-men/comment-page-1/#comment-8297</link>
		<dc:creator>Self Love &#171; Posterwire.com &#171; the movie poster weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 00:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/04/16/little-big-men/#comment-8297</guid>
		<description>[...] Grant and secrets, is it just us or does the male &#8220;Black Tuxedo&#8221; poster look just a bit phallic? Maybe we are seeing things with so much talk about Brokeback Mountain and the Oscars [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Grant and secrets, is it just us or does the male &#8220;Black Tuxedo&#8221; poster look just a bit phallic? Maybe we are seeing things with so much talk about Brokeback Mountain and the Oscars [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericb2038</title>
		<link>http://posterwire.com/archives/2005/04/16/little-big-men/comment-page-1/#comment-8082</link>
		<dc:creator>ericb2038</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.posterwire.com/archives/2005/04/16/little-big-men/#comment-8082</guid>
		<description>Nothing new under the sun indeed.

Here&#039;s one quite creative from 1971:
http://www.postermandan.com/images/telephonebook1.jpg

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing new under the sun indeed.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one quite creative from 1971:<br />
<a href="http://www.postermandan.com/images/telephonebook1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.postermandan.com/images/telephonebook1.jpg</a></p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
